Fairfax City Proposes Illegal Contract with Australian Company

On January 13, the Fairfax city council will adopt a contract with Redflex Traffic Systems to install deadly red light cameras at ten intersections in Fairfax, Virginia. How does this work?

Redflex, a company based in Melbourne, Australia, promises to pay the city of Fairfax for the privilege of installing the cameras, reviewing the photographs, creating public relations material promoting the system (i.e. propaganda), repairing any damage, preparing all materials for court hearings, mailing citations and collecting fine payments. It’s all spelled out in Appendix B of the contract (warning: PDF) You might be wondering, if Redflex is doing so much then what role does the city have? The answer is: none. In fact, Fairfax doesn’t even need to go down to the bank and cash its giant monthly check.

Redflex will deposit all of the ticket revenue in the city’s bank account — minus a monthly fee of $4,740 per intersection or a grand total of $568,800  per year. In fact, Redflex guarantees that the city will not, under any circumstances, lose any money on the deal, even if no tickets are ever issued. This so-called “cost neutrality” provision, spelled out in Appendix D, also happens to be illegal.

The contract says:

Cost Neutrality
Cost neutrality is assured to Customer — Customer will never be required to pay Redflex more than actual cash received by Redflex, and such cost neutrality should be reconciled on a monthly basis. This is a material provision of this Agreement and a condition precedent for Customer agreeing to enter into this Agreement.

In other words, despite all the wonderful benefits promised, the city has no interest in paying for its “safety” program. The most important provision in the entire document, the “condition precedent,” is that the city of Fairfax make a profit. We’ll let the reader decide whether that’s a shady motivation or not. Let’s look instead at what the Code of Virginia has to say about it.

A private entity may enter into an agreement with a locality to be compensated for providing the traffic light signal violation monitoring system or equipment, and all related support services, to include consulting, operations and administration….  No locality shall enter into an agreement for compensation based on the number of violations or monetary penalties imposed.

So, let’s think about this. Redflex must be able to keep $4,740 per intersection per month from the cash it collects from motorists. That’s roughly a total of 95 paid tickets. What happens if only half that amount, say 45 tickets, are actually paid? That would mean that Redflex would collect $2,250, but Fairfax would not be required to make up the difference because the contract says: “Customer will never be required to pay Redflex more than actual cash received by Redflex.”

That means if Redflex collects $2,250 in monetary payments, the company — a private entity — will be compensated $2,250. If Redflex collects on one more ticket to $2,300, then Redflex will be compensated $2,300. And so on up to $4,740. There is no getting around the fact that this would be compensation according to the number of violations and the amount of monetary penalties imposed.

An appellate court in California has already considered this issue and struck down a similar contract between the city of Fullerton and a different firm, Nestor Traffic Systems (NTS). The judge ruled:

The possibility that fees could be negotiated ‘down’ if it is determined fees paid to NTS exceed ‘net program revenues being realized,’ indirectly ties fees to NTS to the amount of revenue generated from the program. If insufficient revenue is generated to cover the monthly fee, the fee could be ‘negotiated down.’ As such, NTS has an incentive to ensure sufficient revenues are generated to cover the monthly fee.

So, not only is what Fairfax City proposes to do dangerous, it’s also illegal.

Advertisements

16 Responses to Fairfax City Proposes Illegal Contract with Australian Company

  1. Welcome CameraFRAUD.com! It looks like life is about to become much more interesting in the DC metro area.

  2. RPr says:

    a foreign company video recording 24-7 on American soil

    I don’t think so

  3. Doc says:

    East coasters- Velcommen to de United Soviet Socialists Republic of Amerrikka..no privacy for you!

  4. […] College Station is not alone in ignoring state prohibitions on per-ticket compensation. More than fifty California jurisdictions use cost neutrality contracts declared illegal by an appellate court in Orange County, but cities have successfully lobbied courts to keep these decisions unpublished which prevents them from being cited in a court proceeding for any purpose. Maryland cities likewise have flouted the state prohibition on per-ticket compensation for contractors that operate photo enforcement programs by claiming that the contractors are not “operating” the program. In Virginia, the city of Fairfax adopted a cost neutral contract with Redflex in violation of state law. […]

  5. […] in injuries is unacceptable. We reject the concept that cities can ignore the law and adopt illegal per-ticket contracts with foreign companies. Shoot an email to capitalfraud at gmail.com if you want to […]

  6. […] News and Fairfax City which joined Virginia Beach in thumbing their noses at state law by inking illegal per-ticket contracts with an Australian company, Redflex Traffic Systems, to outsource […]

  7. […] per-ticket basis up to a level capped at approximately $5000 per intersection per month. The group CameraFraud.com argues that this arrangement directly violates a state law banning per-ticket payments for red […]

  8. […] per-ticket basis up to a level capped at approximately $5000 per intersection per month. The group CameraFraud.com argues that this arrangement directly violates a state law banning per-ticket payments for red […]

  9. Hey, cool tips. I’ll buy a glass of beer to that person from that chat who told me to go to your site 🙂
    p.s. Year One is already on the Internet and you can watch it for free.

  10. Makeup DIY says:

    Hey hun, nice website! I really like this blog post.. I was wondering about this for a long time now. This cleared a lot up for me! Do you have a rss feed that I can add?

  11. Jay says:

    In that youtube video, I think that guy’s reaction was a perfect example of how video monitoring affects people. They like to say “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear” clearly though, this guy was just doing his job…nothing to hide. Though the mere knowledge that a camera was on him made him so uncomfortable that he shut off his computer, shut off his lights, and went into “hiding”. It practically paralyzed him and made him too uncomfortable to function normally and even to his VERY SIMPLE job. This is how a sane person with nothing to hide reacts to just the knowledge of being watched and recorded. The presence of a camera alone will have an affect on people’s behaviour unquestionably, and that affect is negative. So, imagine now an entire society (normal people, with nothing to hide) which feels “paralyzed” by the presence of cameras. It is a limiting effect which instantly makes people self conscious and insecure. I think it’s no secret that people aren’t at their best in this state.

    ANY TIME PEOPLE ARE BEING WATCHED, FOR ANY PURPOSE, IT LIMITS THEM AND DIMINISHES THEIR HUMANITY AND THEIR SPIRIT TO ACHIEVE.

    I am sure a study of this would shed some alarming light on the subject. Especially when weighed against the statistics that show VERY FEW criminals are actually apprehended as a result of video monitoring.

  12. Me-Shell says:

    Does DC law pertaining to speed cameras require a posted warning sign indicating use of camera and how far in advance must the warning be posted?

  13. Despite its pungent odor and bad reputation for leaving
    people with “garlic breath,” garlic has many health benefits.
    All you need to do is take some garlic cloves and crush them.
    This compound in tea tree oil has potent anti-bacterial abilities.

  14. levitra says:

    I know this if off topic but I’m looking into starting my own blog and was wondering what all is required to get set up? I’m assuming
    having a blog like yours would cost a pretty penny?
    I’m not very internet savvy so I’m not 100% sure. Any tips or advice would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks

  15. Tony Nguyen says:

    TO DAY APRIL 03 / 2016 = // ANGEL N NGUYEN, CASE No.NC 037603 (UNLIMITED ) LEGAL UNDER A LAW SUITE TOO TO DAY APRIL 03 /2016 =//

    PLEASE HOPE DEAR SIR OR MADAM PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND SENATE : SENATORS OF THE 114 th OF CONGRESS AND NINE SIR OR MADAM SUPREME COURT WASHINGTON,DC AND LIBRARY OF CONGRESS AND DEAR SIR OR MADAM IN UNITED STATES PLEASE HELP PLEASE , NEED YOUR HELP

    ANGEL N NGUYEN, VIET NAMESE APOLOGIZE MY ENGLISH , NO CHOICE WAS BY MY SELF HELD MY MATTER WRONGFUL DEATH ACCIDENT KILL CALIFORNIA JAN 28 /2004 FREE-WAY 405 SOUTH SIGNAL HILLS TIME 07:22.A.M, EXIT ORANGE AVE LONG BEACH, CA HONDA ACCORD EX V6 ,YEAR 2000 , REAR RIGHT TIRE MICHELIN MY DAUGHTER WAS USE TIRE MICHELIN – 33222.MILES THERE IS EXTENSIVE RUN FLAT DAMAGES TIRE & WHEEL KILLED MY DAUGHTER LOSS CONTROL ,

    ** HONDA SEAT BELT RIPPED NOT HOLD MY DAUGHTER FULY OUT OF VEHICLE DIED QUICKLY AT FREE-WAY 405 ,SOUTH SIGNAL HILLS YEAR 2004 & 2005 & 2006 & 2007 & 2008 AND YEAR 2009 NONE HISTORY JAN 28 /2004 =//

    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, ACCIDENT KILL CALIFORNIA JAN 28 /2004 FREE-WAY 405 SOUTH SIGNAL HILLS TIME 07:22,A.M, EXIT ORANGE AVE LONG BEACH, CA ALL 15 COMPANIES BELONG AMERICA HONDA AND NORTH AMERICA MICHELIN COMPANIES CONTROL FOLLOWING MY DAUGHTER PASSING 5 DAYS WAS LIEN SALE MY DAUGHTER CAR HONDA YEAR 2000 , CONTROL SIX YEARS NONE HISTORY JAN 28 /2004=

    ( DID NOT APPEARANCE FOR MY DAUGHTER WRONGFUL DEATH ACCIDENT KILL CALIFORNIA JAN 28 /2004 )

    ANGEL N NGUYEN, MEMORIES JUNE 18 /2009 TO MARCH 18 /2010 STORY BY ANGEL NGUYEN, DEAR SIR OR MADAM CAPTIAN POLICE OFFICERS AT SUPREME COURT HELPING ANGEL N NGUYEN, POST ON ALL WEB SITE >accident kill California jan 28 /2004 =
    WEBMASTER > Supreme court Washington, D.C webmaster wrongful death accident kill California jan 28 /2004 =
    WEB SITE > nguoi me gan muoi nam di doi cong ly cho con gai =
    WEB SITE LIBRARY > Tony Nguyen PLEASE SEAR SIR OR MADAM . . . Facebook =
    MY FACE BOOK BY TONY NGUYEN, 98096 > https://facebook.com/tonynguyen.98096 =

    ANGEL NGUYEN, HOPE **PLEASE DEAR SIR OR MADAM PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA AND DEAR SIR UNITED STATES US SENATE: SENATORS OF THE 114 th OF CONGRESS PLEASE NEED YOUR HELP PLEASE , WRONGFUL DEATH BACCIDENT KILL CALIFORNIA JAN 28 /2004 =
    TO DAY APRIL 03 /2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: